AIMS Bellur · FacultyCollege-specific record · source periods shown below
Selected institutional faculty entries
Department
Name
Role
Qualification
Anatomy
Dr. Tejaswi HL
Vice Principal, Professor and Head
MBBS, MD
Biochemistry
Dr. Aliya Nusrath
Vice Principal, Professor and Head
MBBS, MD
Physiology
Dr. Anand K.S.S
Professor and Head
MBBS, MD
Source period
Undated institutional webpage reviewed 28 October 2026. This is a dated or undated documentary snapshot, not a live staff attendance report.
Publication scope
Selected roles and qualifications are shown without personal phone numbers, attendance identifiers or an invented faculty score. Current appointments and the full current roster remain subject to verification.
A newer leadership record
The August 2026 Darpan newsletter identifies Dr. K. M. Shivakumar as the new Dean-cum-Principal and Dr. Aliya Nusrath as Vice Principal. This dated leadership record is kept separate from the undated departmental staff webpage, so an older committee roster is not silently treated as the current leadership list.
Departmental teaching record
The institutional staff list identifies selected heads in Anatomy, Physiology and Biochemistry, as shown in the table. These entries describe named academic roles and qualifications. They do not establish a student-to-teacher ratio, individual mentoring allocation or live attendance. The source period is shown because a staff appointment can change independently of a programme’s sanctioned intake.
Related study and comparison context
Teaching subjects, mentorship and academic choices
The college records above retain their dates and limitations. These original reading cards explain related educational choices and regional comparisons; they are not additional official college disclosures, new fee demands or promises of admission or employment.
Understand the teaching role behind a name
A faculty list becomes more useful when it is connected with the kind of learning a student is researching. A department head has an academic leadership role, while a learner's day-to-day experience also involves the organisation of classes, practical work, supervised clinical learning and feedback. The selected AIMS names above are documentary entries, not a personal mentoring allocation. The following cards explain subject and teaching contexts so that an applicant can ask more focused questions. They should be read as educational background alongside the dated roster, rather than as a claim about which teacher will supervise a particular student next week.
Anatomy connects structure with later clinical learning
Anatomy is a foundational subject for understanding the organisation of the human body. A student comparing teaching in this area can consider how three-dimensional relationships, microscopic structure and the interpretation of diagrams are brought together. Different learners may benefit from different combinations of explanation, practical study and revision. At AIMS, the named Anatomy entry and the retained course catalogue provide the institutional starting point. A constructive enquiry concerns how those learning activities are organised for the relevant programme. It is more informative than treating the number of names on a webpage as a complete measure of teaching quality or individual access to a teacher.
Physiology asks how body systems work and how processes relate to one another. In an educational comparison, this involves more than remembering isolated facts: a learner needs to connect mechanisms, interpret observations and explain relationships clearly. A prospective AIMS student can ask how classroom explanation and practical learning support that process at their stage of study. The staff record identifies a departmental role; it does not describe every teaching session. Keeping subject purpose and staff evidence together makes the profile useful without inventing contact hours, an individual timetable or a guaranteed amount of one-to-one academic support.
Biochemistry links mechanisms with interpretation
Biochemistry provides a way to understand biological processes at a molecular level and to connect those processes with the interpretation of laboratory information. A learner considering the subject can ask how scientific concepts, practical work and the limits of interpretation are taught. The AIMS Biochemistry entries identify named academic roles, while the course catalogue distinguishes the medical qualification from other forms of laboratory study. Those are different pieces of evidence. A good comparison looks at the kind of learning the student wants to pursue and the programme actually listed, rather than assuming that every laboratory-related course or teaching position has the same purpose.
Laboratory subjects require different questions
Pathology and Microbiology are both relevant to the understanding of disease, but they are not interchangeable subjects or qualifications. A course comparison can consider the questions each discipline asks, the evidence it uses and the relationship between teaching and diagnostic work. For a student researching AIMS, the retained catalogue gives exact programme names to investigate further. A teaching laboratory, a research laboratory and a clinical service may have related functions while still serving different users. Ask about the programme's learning arrangements rather than inferring a student's practical access from a service list or a broad statement that laboratories are available on campus.
Clinical teaching involves reasoning and communication
Clinical education combines subject knowledge with the interpretation of patient information, communication and supervised professional practice. AIMS's General Medicine description identifies undergraduate and postgraduate teaching, giving a concrete departmental context for that enquiry. A learner can ask how case discussion, observation and feedback are organised at the appropriate stage. The focus should be on the educational process, not an assumption that each listed hospital activity becomes an individual student's responsibility. A department's service role and a student's authorised participation are connected but different matters. Neither can be reduced to a faculty rating assembled from an undated list of names.
Surgical learning needs supervision and progression
For a reader considering one of the listed MS subjects, useful teaching questions include how skills are introduced, how supervised learning develops and how feedback relates to the stage of training. AIMS's simulation description gives a separate context for practice using training equipment. Simulation and clinical learning can serve different purposes; one should not be treated as proof of unrestricted access to the other. This is a framework for comparing educational organisation, not a claim that a particular student will perform a stated number of procedures. The qualification, department and current programme arrangements need to remain attached to the enquiry.
Community Medicine broadens the learning setting
AIMS's Community Medicine description includes population data, health systems, communication and research as part of its academic focus. This gives a learner a different perspective from a comparison limited to hospital wards. A student interested in the subject can consider how to analyse information, discuss community questions and work with others while respecting the context of the work. These are educational interests, not a recruitment promise. The departmental page establishes an institutional subject area; an individual's field assignment, project supervision and assessment arrangements still depend on the applicable programme rather than being established by this general faculty profile.
Mentorship is a relationship, not a name count
A long roster can show the range of documented academic roles without explaining how a particular student's questions are addressed. Useful mentorship questions concern the process for seeking help, discussing progress and receiving feedback. A student might need support in understanding a subject, planning a feasible research question or preparing for an assessment. Those needs are different from the administrative role of a department head. This profile does not assign a mentor or publish private staff contact details. It connects the documentary faculty record with practical academic questions that can be taken through the college's authorised contact process.
A research discussion is more productive when the student can describe a question, a realistic scope and the kind of methodological help needed. AIMS's student-research record demonstrates a research context, but the existence of earlier accepted proposals does not establish that a supervisor is currently available for a new project. A learner can ask how a proposal is developed and what academic review applies before work begins. The aim is to understand the learning process and the responsibilities involved. A completed publication, a proposal acceptance and a student's initial idea should remain separate stages rather than being combined into one claim of research output.
Compare departments across regional colleges
Mandya Institute of Medical Sciences, Hassan Institute of Medical Sciences and Mysore Medical College and Research Institute offer regional profiles for a broader subject comparison. Begin with the same qualification or department at each institution. A current named roster, a course description and a record of academic activity can contribute different evidence. An old list with more names is not automatically stronger evidence than a newer, narrower disclosure. The comparison should keep dates and roles visible and avoid inventing staff ratios or rankings. This lets the reader identify which institution-specific questions remain open without suggesting that all teaching arrangements are identical.
Turn the roster into an academic enquiry
The most useful next step is a short, subject-specific enquiry: the qualification being considered, the stage of study, the teaching arrangement of interest and the evidence already reviewed. This is clearer than asking whether all faculty are good or requesting a universal score. AIMS's dated leadership record and undated departmental entries provide a starting point, not a complete live directory. Keep any subsequent clarification with its date and relevant programme. MedCollege's existing contact route can help organise an enquiry, while a confirmed institutional response would be needed to establish an individual arrangement, current appointment or academic opportunity.